Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Med Phys ; 51(3): 2293-2305, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37898105

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The combination of magnetic resonance imaging and proton therapy offers the potential to improve cancer treatment. The magnetic field (MF)-dependent change in the dosage of ionization chambers in magnetic resonance imaging-integrated proton therapy (MRiPT) is considered by the correction factor k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ , which needs to be determined experimentally or computed via Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. PURPOSE: In this study, k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ was both measured and simulated with high accuracy for a plane-parallel ionization chamber at different clinical relevant proton energies and MF strengths. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dose-response of the Advanced Markus chamber (TM34045, PTW, Freiburg, Germany) irradiated with homogeneous 10 × $\times$ 10 cm 2 $^2$ quasi mono-energetic fields, using 103.3, 128.4, 153.1, 223.1, and 252.7 MeV proton beams was measured in a water phantom placed in the MF of an electromagnet with MF strengths of 0.32, 0.5, and 1 T. The detector was positioned at a depth of 2 g/cm 2 $^2$ in water, with chamber electrodes parallel to the MF lines and perpendicular to the proton beam incidence direction. The measurements were compared with TOPAS MC simulations utilizing COMSOL-calculated 0.32, 0.5, and 1 T MF maps of the electromagnet. k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ was calculated for the measurements for all energies and MF strengths based on the equation: k B ⃗ , M , Q = M Q M Q B ⃗ $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}=\frac{M_\mathrm{Q}}{M_\mathrm{Q}^{\vec{B}}}$ , where M Q B ⃗ $M_\mathrm{Q}^{\vec{B}}$ and M Q $M_\mathrm{Q}$ were the temperature and air-pressure corrected detector readings with and without the MF, respectively. MC-based correction factors were determined as k B ⃗ , M , Q = D det D det B ⃗ $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}=\frac{D_\mathrm{det}}{D_\mathrm{det}^{\vec{B}}}$ , where D det B ⃗ $D_\mathrm{det}^{\vec{B}}$ and D det $D_\mathrm{det}$ were the doses deposited in the air cavity of the ionization chamber model with and without the MF, respectively. Furthermore, MF effects on the chamber dosimetry are studied using MC simulations, examining the impact on the absorbed dose-to-water ( D W $D_{W}$ ) and the shift in depth of the Bragg peak. RESULTS: The detector showed a reduced dose-response for all measured energies and MF strengths, resulting in experimentally determined k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ values larger than unity. For all energies and MF strengths examined, k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ ranged between 1.0065 and 1.0205. The dependence on the energy and the MF strength was found to be non-linear with a maximum at 1 T and 252.7 MeV. The MC simulated k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ values agreed with the experimentally determined correction factors within their standard deviations with a maximum difference of 0.6%. The MC calculated impact on D W $D_{W}$ was smaller 0.2 %. CONCLUSION: For the first time, measurements and simulations were compared for proton dosimetry within MFs using an Advanced Markus chamber. Good agreement of k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ was found between experimentally determined and MC calculated values. The performed benchmarking of the MC code allows for calculating k B ⃗ , M , Q $k_{\vec{B},M,Q}$ for various ionization chamber models, MF strengths and proton energies to generate the data needed for a proton dosimetry protocol within MFs and is, therefore, a step towards MRiPT.


Assuntos
Terapia com Prótons , Prótons , Radiometria/métodos , Terapia com Prótons/métodos , Método de Monte Carlo , Água , Campos Magnéticos
2.
Med Phys ; 50(11): 7294-7303, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37161832

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As it promises more precise and conformal radiation treatments, magnetic resonance imaging-integrated proton therapy (MRiPT) is seen as a next step in image guidance for proton therapy. The Lorentz force, which affects the course of the proton pencil beams, presents a problem for beam delivery in the presence of a magnetic field. PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of the 0.32-T perpendicular magnetic field of an MR scanner on the delivery of proton pencil beams inside an MRiPT prototype system. METHODS: An MRiPT prototype comprising of a horizontal pencil beam scanning beam line and an open 0.32-T MR scanner was used to evaluate the impact of the vertical magnetic field on proton beam deflection and dose spot pattern deformation. Three different proton energies (100, 150, and 220 MeV) and two spot map sizes (15 × 15 and 30 × 20 cm2 ) at four locations along the beam path without and with magnetic field were measured. Pencil-beam dose spots were measured using EBT3 films and a 2D scintillation detector. To study the magnetic field effects, a 2D Gaussian fit was applied to each individual dose spot to determine the central position ( X , Y ) $(X,Y)$ , minimum and maximum lateral standard deviation ( σ m i n $\sigma _{min}$ and σ m a x $\sigma _{max}$ ), orientation (θ), and the eccentricity (ε). RESULTS: The dose spots were subjected to three simultaneous effects: (a) lateral horizontal beam deflection, (b) asymmetric trapezoidal deformation of the dose spot pattern, and (c) deformation and rotation of individual dose spots. The strongest effects were observed at a proton energy of 100 MeV with a horizontal beam deflection of 14-186 mm along the beam path. Within the central imaging field of the MR scanner, the maximum relative dose spot size σ m a x $\sigma _{max}$ decreased by up to 3.66%, while σ m i n $\sigma _{min}$ increased by a maximum of 2.15%. The largest decrease and increase in the eccentricity of the dose spots were 0.08 and 0.02, respectively. The spot orientation θ was rotated by a maximum of 5.39°. At the higher proton energies, the same effects were still seen, although to a lesser degree. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of an MRiPT prototype's magnetic field on the proton beam path, dose spot pattern, and dose spot form has been measured for the first time. The findings show that the impact of the MF must be appropriately recognized in a future MRiPT treatment planning system. The results emphasize the need for additional research (e.g., effect of magnetic field on proton beams with range shifters and impact of MR imaging sequences) before MRiPT applications can be employed to treat patients.


Assuntos
Terapia com Prótons , Prótons , Humanos , Terapia com Prótons/métodos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Campos Magnéticos , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...